[andrewcooke]

i don't know if this helps anyone, but it's vaguely related to the article. if you're read taleb's "antifragile" then you can think of agile development as "antifragile development". and if you do that, and understand the difference between antifragile and merely robust, you can see what "parts" of agile make most sense.

from the article (my emphasis):

> Agile was a personal practice. Implicit is a personal way of orienting oneself towards a development process that accepts, even welcomes, change.