|
|
|
|
|
by danso
4473 days ago
|
|
Ah yes, mutating the class is most definitely a concern...which is why I give you an additional +1 for advocating for a Hash to be passed into the constructor. This seems to be what the Twitter gem did too, in its newest versions. AFAIK, the Twitter configuration was a mutation to the class via config object, and now it's been revised to be thread safe: https://github.com/sferik/twitter#configuration client = Twitter::REST::Client.new do |config|
config.consumer_key = "YOUR_CONSUMER_KEY"
config.consumer_secret = "YOUR_CONSUMER_SECRET"
config.access_token = "YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
config.access_token_secret = "YOUR_ACCESS_SECRET"
end
|
|