| > Either way, in what world do you see something out of the ordinary — but not strange — happening at work and line up to gawk at it? Congratulations, you've decided to not look at out of the ordinary things for fear of implications of sexual objectification. But me -- if weird stuff happens in or outside of my office, I'm gonna watch. > It's certainly possible for a bench-full of 20-something programmers to sexually objectify someone My last comment said "I'm not saying it Wasn't sexual objectification," > Julie was made to feel uncomfortable, and since she's the best eye witness to the event we've got, there's no reason to doubt her testimony The number of witnesses has no bearing on the truth, validity or bias of the statement given by one witness. > You don't need to stick up for them I'm not. I'm saying it's too early for those of you championing Julie to get your pitchforks out. |