Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Silhouette 4473 days ago
Unfortunately, it could be a very expensive business to get into if there are patent-encumbered formats involved. In the cases where it's most likely to be useful, it also seems least likely to happen.
2 comments

>if there are patent-encumbered formats involved.

Patents would not discourage manual conversion. I.E., a human looks at the old presentation and recreates it in the new software. I'm just not sure that there are any presentation worth this cost. God knows that most presentations I have been subjected to are not.

Even then I'm not convinced, without talking to a lawyer, that it would be safe to recreate in a patent-encumbered format.

Regardless of how well patents in general might or might not serve their original purpose, I tend to think that patents that are essentially just locking up data formats do not encourage progress in the way that they are supposed to. I think the US was onto something when it came to copyright and typeface designs, and a similar principle ought to apply to data formats.

I think this is a non-issue for the bulk of any business that does this. An Microsoft or Apple is going to sue a business that upgrades documents in old formats to their newer formats? Maybe, but I'd be surprised. If anything there'd probably be licensing.
Reverse engineering file formats is covered by fair use due to this very reason.
What does fair use have to do with patents?