|
|
|
|
|
by cheez
4478 days ago
|
|
Here's the chain of money as I see it when making a movie: 1. Someone comes up with an idea for a movie
2. They approach someone with money to create the movie
3. Monied person gives idea person $X to make the movie with the assumption that they will receive back $X + $Y (ignoring Hollywood accounting).
4. Movie is made. People are paid out of $X
5a. Movie is successful. Monied person receives back $X + $Y
5b. Movie is unsuccessful. Monied person receives back $X - $Z None of this simplified hypothetical happens without the idea or the monied person. The idea person makes an arrangement that allows them to realize their idea and make some coin. The monied person... Well, he just cares about money. So he wants to make more. If movies are perpetually unsuccessful, guess what happens? The monied person ends up investing in something else, leaving the idea person out of luck. I do agree with some of the other people on here that piracy puts pressure on the business people to improve access. |
|