Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by delluminatus 4478 days ago
A scientist would respond: How many ethical theories were accepted by contemporaries, only to later be shown to be flawed?

If you want to attribute deaths to bad science, then you must also attribute far more to bad philosophy.

1 comments

Thats not really fair.

The point I think the Parent is trying to make is. Remember what science is and how it works and why it's useful.

It's perfectly fair. What's not fair about it?

Science is a loose methodology. But scientific institutions are fallible. Scientists are fallible. And the methodology is fallible as well, especially in the short term. The whole point is that even if mistakes are made in the small, progress is made in the large.

I don't really understand the point you (or the parent) are trying to make.

You are cherry picking one part of his argument and claiming that this is what he claims.

He isn't only talking about ethics.

What is he talking about?