Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by curtis 4477 days ago
That may be true of existing black boxes, but a purpose-designed solid-state black box wouldn't have to be very big. Especially if it was optimized for surviving impact with water rather than, for example, a mountain.

In fact, I was just thinking about how you could probably put a miniature blackbox in every single airline seat. Airline seats are already designed to float, and you'd only need one of them to be recoverable. Such a black box might not be capable of storing everything traditional black boxes do, but if it managed to capture a last moment GPS position it might make it much easier to find the regular black box.

1 comments

> Especially if it was optimized for surviving impact with water rather than, for example, a mountain.

I think that's a distinction without difference. At 500mph, the water might as well be rock.

I'm not at all certain that's true at the extremes for which black boxes are designed. A difference between thousands of Gs and tens-of-thousands of Gs wouldn't matter for the airplane fuselage, but it might matter for solid-state electronics. I don't know if you'd get that kind of force differential between a water impact and say, slamming into a solid granite wall. But I'm to ready to discount it.

But even if we assume that there really isn't a meaningful difference in the physics of a ground vs. water impact, I think there still might be an advantage to having your conventional black box optimized for maximum survivability and having an auxiliary black box which sacrifices some degree of survivability at the extremes in exchange for improved discoverability after an accident.