|
|
|
|
|
|
by redler
4479 days ago
|
|
|
In 2012, France produced 41.3 million hectoliters of wine, and the US produced 28.4 million hectoliters. 88 percent of US production was from California. So it's true that US wine is primarily from California, and it's true that France produces significantly more. But it's also true that the US does produce quite a bit. One might speculate that some of the price difference is due to the kind of market that evolves when, culturally, wine is not consumed as frequently as an everyday staple of the dinner table, but rather as something for special occasions. References: https://www.wineinstitute.org/resources/statistics/article83 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-27/french-bulk-wine-pr... |
|
|
By your numbers France produces 145% of what the US does while having 20% of the population. So per-capita it produces a lot more wine. On the other hand the French drink more wine. I found a table of consumption per capita[1] and looked up the populations of France and the USA on wolfram alpha. The end result is that France produces 142% of it's consumption, while the US produces 95% of its consumption.
So the French need to export their wine to find a market, and that's probably only easy for the high-end stuff. That should make entry-level but still good wine easy to buy. That's certainly our experience in Portugal as well. It's one of the barometers I use for the state of our wine industry. If I can still find good 2-5€ bottles of wine on the supermarket it means we're still not good enough at exporting it.
[1] http://www.wineinstitute.org/files/2010_Per_Capita_Wine_Cons...