|
|
|
|
|
by bayareaguy
6162 days ago
|
|
You don't need access to the source. If you don't like how the software works, you have two options: (1) Don't buy the software, or (2) write new software. What about option (3): fix it yourself (or hire someone who can) if it's important to you, which in practical terms means you do need the source. My point was that many people feel they have a right to the source code. It's not a right at all, no matter what Stallman says. That's odd. I believe the authors of the software I use on my FreeBSD server claim otherwise. |
|
The beliefs of the developers of FreeBSD, Torvalds, or Stallman do not have to power to null and void several decades of legislation and legal precedent. Again, my original comment was how FOSS seems to have given people the idea that every piece of software should have viewable source.
I've toyed around with the idea of open source. I use open source software. I'm typing this in Firefox running on Ubuntu. I use the GNU compilers, both C and C++. I'm simply trying to say that there is place for both open source and closed source. Given the business I'm in, I will never release open source software, and I expect the software I do write will continue to be protected under various legislation.