Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by natrius 4481 days ago
If by fallout you mean tons of revenue, then I agree.
1 comments

I'm thinking more like a huge lawsuit.
Libel? Slander? Where's the suit? If this guy actually is Satoshi the last thing in the world he wants is to be on a witness stand.

Opening a case against Newsweek lets them subpoena all sorts of records that they aren't entitled to with out a case, primarily because the truth is a defence to slander / libel, and if this guy loses then he's forever Satoshi.

Also it's going to be pretty difficult to prove that he suffered damages from the article.

>Also it's going to be pretty difficult to prove that he suffered damages from the article.

It depends on what the fallout from it is, in terms of internet attention. If he's not "the real Satoshi" and he starts getting harassed because of this article, I'd say he has a pretty decent case: If the statement "is false, caused harm, and was made without adequate research", then most non-celebrity citizens have a pretty strong case.

I know you may not mean this ... But, it is interesting to think of being "accused" if creating Bitcoin as "slander."
See my comment above re: potential liability: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7357827