|
|
|
|
|
by aegiso
4488 days ago
|
|
Way too much schadenfreude given Gox's history. Although contrary to popular belief Gox was never a Magic exchange, they were a Bitcoin startup at a time when Bitcoin was not much more than internet lols and pizza deliveries. The first thing you do when hacking together a stupid exchange for a joke e-currency isn't writing unit tests. You just write the code and blast it up on a domain you had lying around for a different project. Cue runaway success, a company sale or two, scaling issues with complicated technology and not much precedent legal or otherwise, and this is what you get. There is nothing at all surprising about this code. And it seems Gox's problems were much more deeply rooted than the subjective non-compliance of their code with "best practices". |
|
The Wayback Machine disagrees.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070701000000*/http://mtgox.com
Whether it was open as one is unclear, but that was the obvious intent here.
Also, remember that the current owners aren't the original owners. This code is wrong in design but new in attempted style, made or majorly updated within the past year or two (based on the language features used).