[cgriswald]

Am I the only one that loves the fact that it involves 64K programmers?

[dredmorbius]

As with earlier numbers: sounds like it should be enough for anybody, but I can think of a number of other companies which have been excluded from the suit which should be included. Cisco comes to mind.

[rapind]

I think he's saying he loves that it's 2^6 (K) programmers.

[dman]

That sir is not a serious definition of 64k. We all know 64k == 65536 ( 2^16 ).

[rapind]

touché

[dredmorbius]

Yes, I got that. As in 64k (or 640k) ought to be enough for anyone.

And my point was, well, it's not ;-)

[patrickmay]

64k programmers ought to be enough for anybody.

[leoc]

Well, the C64 was an Apple-beater...