|
|
|
|
|
|
by vezzy-fnord
4490 days ago
|
|
|
Essentially it's proprietary, but with a viewable source. Similar to Microsoft's "shared source" licensing models. Still proprietary at the end of the day. Let's not dilute this with misleading euphemisms like "closed source" and "open source". Freedom is no priority here, it seems. |
|
|