|
|
|
|
|
|
by siglesias
4492 days ago
|
|
|
With all respect, you're way, way oversimplifying things in an intellectually dishonest way. I work with folks who worked with Jobs and he was a major, active, creative contributor. His role wasn't, as you say, to be handed products defined and designed by other people and figure out how to sell them. Yes, he was a brilliant marketer. But I don't see why people work backwards from that and say he was only a brilliant marketer. What a strange kind of illogic! |
|
|
He contributed style and color choices to the designs of others. To quote you, "You're way, way oversimplifying things in an intellectually dishonest way."
> His role wasn't, as you say, to be handed products defined and designed by other people and figure out how to sell them.
No, he decided what color and shape the final product would have. But he could not create the technology, he could only change its external appearance.
> But I don't see why people work backwards from that and say he was only a brilliant marketer.
That's easy to answer -- name the product that Jobs designed, that someone else packaged for him.
Don't take my word for this -- read the Jobs biography (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs_(book)), which ultimately agrees with my view, describes Jobs as a clinical narcissist, perpetually insecure about what he didn't know, and always on the creative sidelines trying to exaggerate his role in the final product.