Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by IBM 4493 days ago
Stick with value investing (or index investing if you don't have the skill/discipline/time for it).
3 comments

In other news, the sky is blue. C'mon man, make a useful comment about the site, not just some generic and completely unrelated investment advice.
You could try and write an algo that would carry out your value investing strategy. You could trawl Yahoo for P/E or whatever value metrics you want to look at buy or sell based on certain thresholds.
Successfully implementing a value strategy cannot be codified into an algo

EDIT: There are just too many exceptions and nuances. Every single investment involves more exceptions and nuances that would need to be coded. And if you don't think so, I would bet you don't have alpha :)

I guess I'm agreeing with your statement "Successfully," but it doesn't mean it hasn't been tried:

http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol51No1/24Vol51No1.pdf

Also, weren't the quant funds that were involved in the summer 2007 blowup all running automated value strategies based on Fama+French factor models?

It works really great until it doesn't.

Oh plenty of tryers. Value investing is a lot harder than it looks. And what you're talking about isn't really the definition of value investing (like graham-dodd + infinite details on the individual companies). Those quant funds were running factor models and mid-frequency stat arb
What makes value investing better than index investing? Surely if it is statistically impossible to beat the market on a risk-adjusted basis over time, this also applies to value investing.