|
|
|
|
|
by tommu
4491 days ago
|
|
I get the impression that there is another benefit here. Each tenant has their own space to be responsible for. It's small enough to manage but maybe brings a sense of ownership that would be lacking in a regular municipal type shelter or shared apartment block. |
|
At the risk of sounding insensitive, which is not my intent, in what way would they be responsible for them? If access to the homes is truly unconditional, why keep them in good shape? Or are you just suggesting that by giving people self-contained, separated dwellings, they will think of it more as "their home" and tend to take better care of it?