|
|
|
|
|
by bcantrill
4496 days ago
|
|
(Disclosure: I work at Joyent.) Are you accusing Brendan of misrepresenting SystemTap on slide 93? If so, could you be specific as to what that misrepresentation is? Brendan has a ton of experience earnestly using SystemTap (or rather, trying to use it), and it's hard to see how sharing that experience makes either Brendan or his employer "look stupid." For more details on Brendan's explorations of SystemTap: http://dtrace.org/blogs/brendan/2011/10/15/using-systemtap/
That's several years old at this point, but the architectural limitations highlighted by Brendan haven't changed. |
|
1. 'might' implies the future. As you can tell from the post you're replying to, Systemtap is present thing. I think I actually put most of the tapsets shown on the Wikipedia page around 2009, and I was using them then.
2. Also, as the author partially acknowledges in the next slide, Ubuntu is the dumbest place to illustrate a typical Systemtap experience. I suspect that's deliberate, rather than ignorance as Sun tried that a few years back and I don't think anyone with any interest in the matter is ignorant enough not to remember the shitstorm.
As I've written elsewhere: if your customers mostly run Ubuntu, then test dtrace on Ubuntu too. It'd give you just as accurate impression about what the dtrace 'experience' is as installing SystemTap on Ubuntu.
Edit: actually looks like Joyent wrote the shitstorm post for a few years ago, you've still got it up, you still don't see anything wrong, and you just linked to it.
christ read the HN comments from 2011. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3118416
Edit 2: you're Bryan Cantrill. You didn't seem to care much about performance a while ago: http://cryptnet.net/mirrors/texts/kissedagirl.html
Edit 3: more Cantrill classiness http://www.quora.com/Node-js/Why-did-Ben-Noordhuis-decide-to...
Sorry to anyone who thinks I've gotten personal, but this guy is a well known... unsavoury character.