[mikeryan]

I kind of agree but to the article's credit it does filter for voicemail.

To me it seems one option would be to remove the recent dot after viewing a voicemail.

That being said I think these two systems are independent of each other, ie there's nothing to link the voicemail to a recent call (seems the recent call is a "client" side action as opposed to the voicemail which is "server" side action). Without some sort of call id they can't really link the two to remove the dot on the recents when cleared from voicemail.

Actually the more I think about it the more I believe this is likely the case, I don't think recent calls are linked to voicemail. Anyone know?

[tdavis]

That wouldn't matter. After a voicemail is received, compare its attributes to recently missed calls. If there was a missed call from the same number that left the voicemail, chances are good the recent highlight can be removed.

[mikeryan]

"chances are good" is a slippery slope.

[dkasper]

You could make this work if you took into account the time the call and voice mail were received. You could even treat them as a "conversation" kind of how gmail does.

[roc]

The thing that strikes me as odd, is that Apple doesn't do this. This problem and work-around were obvious to me the first time I got a voicemail. And Apple doesn't often make thoughtless mistakes like that.

It makes me wonder if AT&Ts voice mail system just isn't giving them enough information to match the records reliably.

(E.g. If the voice mail record doesn't distinguish between the origination number and the callback number, trying to match messages to missed calls would be inconsistent.)

It wouldn't have to be much; just enough margin for error to make the system a little unreliable. Because I can definitely see Apple opting for 'weird, but consistent' over 'inconsistent', even if it is only rarely inconsistent.