Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DivByZero 4497 days ago
I agree on this point that with Facebook training you should have at least some experience but I guess he didn't learn that much :)

$6/400k is like a medium sized agency monthly budget. It's not something you learn to manage in 1 or 2 days training.

You never scale a campaign to that level until you've done weeks if not months of testing and fine tuning with every possible ad's creatives and demographic audience. Starting at $100k/days means whatever goes wrong it's already too late to fix it ... you don't have the time to do any serious testing and optimization.

Moreove it's not that easy to spend $100k/day in canada ... I deal with many Startups and Brands that get Facebook Ads right and their usual problem is they've found the right mix ads/audience to have a very good ROI but they cannot scale it to spend those amounts.

Spending $100k per days probably means that he was targeting the whole canada. Whitout any specific targeting on interests, demographic informations etc. If that's the case and he was getting 150k clicks per day out of a $100k budget he should be pretty happy :)

1 comments

That's what sounds odd about this whole issue. They don't say what the company's marketing budget was, how big a portion of that budget this campaign was, and exactly what their goals are from their campaigns, but I think it would be hard to arrange those numbers in such a way that it would make sense for them to run a ~$500k ad campaign in a medium nobody there had any experience in. Come on guys, run a couple of dozen hundred dollar campaigns to get a feel for how to target them and what returns you can reasonably expect from them. I would expect that nobody spends that kind of money on any kind of ad campaign without knowing a lot more about what the returns from it will be and whether that justifies the expense.