[tool]

How can anyone in this day and age seriously write an article like this, when programming is cooler than it ever was. Wherever I look related to tech nowadays, it's always a very social, well spoken and trimmed young man in his late twenties. All the Googles and Facebooks pride themselves on their laidback, social and party attitude. People don't IRC or use handles anymore, instead, it's linkedin and facebook, showing off your social standing.

If this was written ten years ago, I might understand, but now, clueless.

If anything, it's harder than ever to be an introvert.

[jorgeleo]

"it's always a very social, well spoken and trimmed young man in his late twenties"

This does not means extrovert.

The real question is, after being social and well spoken, does he feels exhausted and ready for a nap?, or does he feels ready for a party? Introverts can be social and well spoken, but it cost them energy to do so; extroverts on the other hand, gain energy being social.

And neither has to do anything with being a good programmer. Correlation does not implies causality

I do agree that is unpopular as ever being an introvert, but then again it was not a choice to be one, it is just the way you were born wired

[analog31]

Is it necessarily a dichotomy? I gain energy from both:

1. Getting into "the zone" and coding for hours

2. Hanging out with a bunch of friends, playing jazz, chatting with members of the audience, etc.

[jorgeleo]

Not at all. It is more black and white, where most people falls in one shade of gray or another, and there is a 50-50 mix too.

A detailed Myers-Briggs test will give you what percent are you on. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator, in particular "The test is scored by evaluating each answer in terms of what it reveals about the taker. Each question is relevant to one of the following cognitive learning styles. Each is not a polar opposite, but a gradual continuum."

I do believe though that there is no correlation with your quality as programmer. Being a good quality programmer is more related to the ability to sustain and simulate detailed abstract models in your mind... but that is a blog post on its own.

[lostcolony]

No, it's a continuum. Most people need both; introverts go stir crazy after a while and have to interact with people, and extroverts get tired and want a moment to themselves.

It's more what drains you faster, what can you handle an excess of more easily. I consider myself an introvert because I very quickly get tired of people and shut down; it takes a day or two of being on my own (or otherwise not interacting socially with others) before I begin to crave it.

Or put another way, as an introvert, solitude may recharge me, but once recharged I need to expend that energy (else I get depressed and antsy). When actually in social settings, I may at first blow through a good chunk of that energy by being amiable and outgoing, once I start getting low I tend to be judicious in how I expend it, as it drains at different rates (crushed in a crowd it drains very fast. Alone with a single friend, talking, eating, gaming, whatever, it drains very slowly).

Few if any people can handle days on end of either solitude or company without tiring of it and needing the other at least briefly.

[aaren]

I think the idea is more that following (2), introverts lose energy whilst extroverts gain energy. (1) doesn't really come into it. You are probably extroverted.

But no it isn't necessarily a dichotomy, rather a rough label of how someone responds to social situations. Their actual character will be much more complex :)

[dualogy]

"All the Googles and Facebooks pride themselves on their laidback, social and party attitude."

Ugh. Great, now that such people invaded programming, where do the rest of us go? :D

[etanazir]

'Googles and Facebooks' are only a subset of software.