|
|
|
|
|
by luckystrike
4505 days ago
|
|
Patrick McKenzie (patio11) wrote about this topic in one of his newsletters. It is a must read. https://training.kalzumeus.com/newsletters/archive/consultin... (You can jump to the section "Scaling A Consulting Business") He also did a podcast with Brennan Dunn on the same topic: http://www.kalzumeus.com/2012/10/10/kalzumeus-podcast-3-grow... Would the subcontractor want to know how much he's getting paid vs the contract,
would this affect his incentive?
Finding good & reliable subcontractors is hard. When you do find such a person, my suggestion is to be as transparent as possible with them. The most probable reason why this person (who we think is good) is subcontracting is either they can't get high value engagements on their own, or don't like the rigmarole of finding good clients. If that is the case, they should understand the markup being charged by you.In the end, if it is a win-win situation for both, they would understand and be happy with it. Of course, the assumption here is that they are reasonable but that you'll have to judge after working with them for a while. I write this as a person who'd prefer working as subcontractor at this point of time. |
|
Two things that I can emphasize off the top of my head are:
1) It is easier to sell features, or weeks of effort, as opposed to billable hours. Billing by the hour is asking for nitpicky accounting. Bill by the week, or by the project (if you are confident about scope and effort) and you can simply exchange money for delivered value.
2) If you "hire" someone as a subcontractor, they are effectively trading some of their earning potential for paycheck security and not having to deal with rainmaking. This is similar to the deal a day job offers. Hopefully they understand this, but you should definitely understand this. You will be absorbing the bulk of the risk and responsibility. Relative pay should reflect this.