[harel]

So many wrongs in one comment. The fact you believe you'll be blamed for dev productivity loss is just not right. Blame? The fact you have to write scripts converting from one source control to another is not good, the fact you resort to hacky powershelling is scary. I wasn't even thinking the "are they still using cvs in 2014" even but I guess I should have. "blame" should exist in source control systems only.

[ygra]

Actually I was agreeing to your point that at the time when CVS is used version control is no longer "just a tool" but a PITA.

I'm the one who suggested conversion to a newer system, so when the other developers need to re-learn and lose a week of productivity that way it is my fault, to some extent.

My conversion script is essentially just automating creating cvs2hg config files for a number of CVS modules (and cleaning up before/after conversion) because our CVS repo is a few GiB in size, containing everything that ever existed (and plenty of things beside that) so a 1:1 conversion isn't that ideal, especially because it will lead to frequent (harmless) merges. But to developers with a CVS background merges are scary.

My cvshg PowerShell script is based around https://wiki.mozilla.org/Using_Mercurial_locally_with_CVS and http://pavelchikulaev.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/using-mercuri..., but tailored to how I use the tools. It allows me to commit happily locally and histedit later when I need commits I can actually share with others.

[harel]

That's different then, I agree. I read your original comment as if you're tasked with something and then expect to be blamed for it.