Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by diydsp 4509 days ago
I just fired up plus.google.com again.

50% of the space is "ADD PEOPLE." The other 50% of the space is "DO YOU KNOW THESE PEOPLE."

Where is the V-A-L-U-E ?

Under the fold at the bottom is "Continue to Google+" Oh, I wasn't there already? That was just the interrogation before Google+ begins?

I continue. Long load time. First thing that appears in 50% of the page is a column of the same people from the previous page. "YOU MAY KNOW." I can't close that window, but I can click "View more." I can also click X on an individual, but each time I do, someone even more remote appears... seriously, really weird foreign names. I start to feel bad for laughing at some of these funny-sounding names.

So, over on the left, ah! A post from my friend with the title "get that art." I look at the preview: It's a thumbnail of a thumbnail with the word "site" above it. Probably the site designer's fault...

But what am I really doing here? There is no 'hook.' There is no reason to be here, there is nothing compelling me. There is nothing I can DO, nothing I can move around, paint, color, amplify, organize. And about these borders: fat, fat borders around everything. So much empty, white space between rectangles. Scrolling down a bit, I see a banner "Follow things you love," with buttons for "Fashion" and "Travel." This is like Yahoo in 1997. How do they "know so much about me" that they think I like Fashion and Travel?

Then, eventually, I reach stuff that's just like facebook: my friend's kid eating a donut. another friend talking about cleaning hairballs in the drain of his shower.

Ok, there's a link I'd like to send to my friend, so I'm going over to facebook an give it to him.

Aren't computers and the internet capable of being fun and interesting or informative and useful? I'll tell you, one facebook is enough. I don't need two of them with friends reposting their shrill political screeds from their personal internet silos. I want to do something useful and valuable with my time on this planet. As a matter of fact, I think trying google+ has made me just want to go for a nice walk! It's a beautiful day outside! Yep, standing up now to put on clothes, open the windows and stumble around the block in the ice and snow!

5 comments

I fire up my G+ stream and get:

A post by Timothy Gowers about Mobius strips and Valentine's Day: https://plus.google.com/103703080789076472131/posts/gYmEcGuN...

A repost by Michael Chui with an animation of a double star + planet system showing chaos: https://plus.google.com/113476531580617567600/posts/Y3yiBojn...

A post by an acquaintance about local politics with interesting infographics.

A post from Rajini Rao titled "An Academic Valentine: The Science Behind Flower Color": https://plus.google.com/114601143134471609087/posts/7mWzModf...

A post by David Brin on an interesting sci-fi TV series I hadn't heard of: https://plus.google.com/116665417191671711571/posts/CJFcZkUf...

A report from Human Rights Watch on sectarian violence in the Central African Republic: https://plus.google.com/113055770163061121890/posts/jYRxedAB...

A repost by Romain Guy about an open source live wallpaper for Android that shows works of art: https://plus.google.com/109538161516040592207/posts/1zueVNE8...

A post from the EFF on the history of surveillance and the Black community: https://plus.google.com/113175636916099066477/posts/ZUoVA3u5...

There's quite some noise around those posts of course, but far less than on Twitter, and the pictures make it easier for me to sift through it. I'm not a fan of social networks but I like to check my G+ stream now and then when I'm bored on the computer. I definitely don't use it as a Facebook replacement (which I don't really use at all actually...).

So like a ghettoized version of RSS?

Thank you, I'll have the open web anyday.

For the rest, I can use Facebook.

Indeed it does what RSS used to do for me. It also adds comments and pictures, something RSS could also do depending on the reader. The real added value of G+ compared to RSS is the original content: a lot of people in Open Source and science, for example, use it as a blog platform. I do wish social networks were less ghettoized, but as a publication medium it doesn't seem less open than a blog to me. There are even tools to generate RSS feeds from G+ streams I think.
I fired up my plus.google.com again.

Beautiful pictures from pro photographers and travelers.

Great links on Android Development by developers I'm following.

I dislike Facebook because it's mostly personal posts that I care less about. My Google+ stream are much more useful especially to my work.

Your network, my network are different. Applies not only to Google+ but on Facebook and Twitter as well.

This is what it comes down to. If you follow uninteresting people, you'll have an uninteresting front page. If you follow no people, you'll have an empty front page. If you put a tiny bit of effort in, you'll have a decent front page.
Not remotely true. For example, even if you did then the "Share what's new" and "You may know" panels cover around 40% of the actual content area available once you've already got rid of the giant bar at the top and empty spaces at the sides. This is on top of their OCD defying love of spamming notifications. And if you have the misfortune to use it to access some of their developer channels, well the noise level in them is mind boggling.

Compare and contrast with FB, which is almost information overload, but it's got the immediate hooks of who's online, what the latest changes are and a few items from the feed all there on the page at the beginning. It also loads a lot faster, while G+ is noticeably slow even on decent machines.

> reposting their shrill political screeds from their personal internet silos

Amen to that. I left the facebook years ago because of this.

If you follow people who share interesting content rather than because you personally know them then you'll have a better experience I think. Granted, it can be time consuming and hard to discover people that share anything worthwhile. I am pretty happy with some of the circles I've curated and my stream has some pretty interesting content. Sure, much of it is just shares of blog articles (blogspam) but at least there is a way to fine-tune what shows up by using people (with less bias than the authors of the blog) to filter what you see. Same with comments and discussions...instead of anonymous comments on articles you can discuss a topic or article with people you sort of know and trust to some degree.

For those here that are intrested in science and technology, I'd recommend following a guy named Mark Bruce who shares a top 10 list of Sci-Tech advancements or discoveries every week. And if anyone wants to jumpstart their stream, they can message me and I'll share some circles.

Distinction is lost on you if you cannot tell the difference between G+ and a big, empty version of Facebook.