|
|
|
|
|
by cesare
6166 days ago
|
|
I totally disagree. And I've made complex web apps since when CGIs in C where the only way to have dynamic generated content. In fact I think it is the contrary: for small sites (and small budgets) frameworks can be ok. For big websites custom code is a must. The idea that using a framework makes code easier to maintain is the complete opposite of my experience. Big (serious) projects require a lot of custom logic which you should write yourself anyway. And it is a lot more painful since you have to stick to the framework logic if you don't want to break things as soon as you update the framework version or if you don't want to make the code unmaintainable. I have made my own libraries which are designed in a modular fashion (not OO) that I constantly improve and reuse. Code is clean and you can easily understand the flow of each section. A MVC framework is not the only way to have clean (modular) code. Your reasoning would apply if you aren't good at designing software architecture, which is a recipe for disaster especially on big projects. |
|
It also doesn't have to be a premade/3rd party one as you've demonstrated by essentially creating your own framework and just calling it by a different name(collection of libraries).
A recipe for disaster in my opinion would be a large project with no code structure/layout guidelines.