|
|
|
|
|
|
by actsasbuffoon
4501 days ago
|
|
|
> can only be evidence of manipulation. That statement is a non-sequitur. It _could_ be interpreted as evidence of manipulation, but that's hardly the only possible explanation. As much as we all wish science was given all the funding it needs and scientists wouldn't have to resort to hoarding information to protect their turf, that's not the world we live in. |
|
|