|
|
|
|
|
|
by protomyth
4516 days ago
|
|
|
I'm all for state's rights, but, given what the article says, I cannot understand how NJ has any ability to issue the subpoena. It isn't an active product that has been used in production so no NJ resident has been "harmed". Its like the NJ prosecutor read some tech article and decided to act. |
|
|