|
|
|
|
|
by tttp
4506 days ago
|
|
I'm not sure you have enough facts to support your arguments 1) most probably if you take into account other factors (social economics ones), the nationality it's not a major one 2) as you said, the wealth created by migrants can be a net positive effect 3) many immigrants (85%) come from EU 4) almost none "ethnic ghettos" in CH 5) agree it's different. CH has about a 1/3 of its population that are migrants and they are generally welcomed and integrated (the regions that got most migrants rejected the initiative). Beside, there isn't a unified "swiss culture". If you simply look at the languages, they are 3 different ones. |
|
Also leaving them to their own devices.
I don't know if that is the case with Switzerland but there is just so much immigrants you can integrate and so much discount work you can get from them before you begin to rip the social fabric of the country; And this is happening in some countries, they push too hard.
So, limiting immigration to some realistic amount seems to be the right thing. Of course this applies less to educated professionals from similar cultures and more to cheap labor.