[billynomates1]

Yeah, paying at less than the advertised wage is insulting. Unless they give you the 20% of the first three months back after the probationary period.

[madaxe_again]

We do. It a) offsets our risk and b) gives them a tangible goal to shoot for.

[illuminate]

"It a) offsets our risk"

You could simply hire better employees rather than disrespecting your candidates. I wouldn't bother pretending that it has anything to do with "risk management". At best, you sound extremely cheap. At worst, it makes you sound like you repeatedly make poor hiring decisions and scramble to adjust for this.

[cryoshon]

You forgot c) lets you take 3 months of work out of someone at %80 of the price.

It's scummy.

[madaxe_again]

Right, but as I said, after the three months, we settle the difference - and it's not 80% either, actually, more like 7%, but hey ho. We've never had anyone object, and it's pretty common practice.

[whichdan]

How is saving $6k at best doing anything other than making your new employee resentful?