Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
JTon
4512 days ago
I've heard this before. How can they "get away" not building it, legally speaking? Makes no sense to me in this context
2 comments
aroch
4512 days ago
Because of how the contract was worded, they didn't have to
actually
provide the service just "attempt" to or something like that
link
kdragon
4511 days ago
Because the bill that awarded them the funding was written in a way where there were no repercussions for not doing so.
link