Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by JTon 4512 days ago
I've heard this before. How can they "get away" not building it, legally speaking? Makes no sense to me in this context
2 comments

Because of how the contract was worded, they didn't have to actually provide the service just "attempt" to or something like that
Because the bill that awarded them the funding was written in a way where there were no repercussions for not doing so.