|
|
|
|
|
|
by jmaschad
4519 days ago
|
|
|
As if science wasn't a belief system as well. As long as the source of your ideas is observation (as in all sciences) you have nothing but belief. The advantage of science isn't that it can proof stuff (which it can't) but that it is open for change instead of being dogmatic. |
|
|
Ergo: I know x will happen because when all the variables are the same in the past, x has always happened.
The accuracy of the prediction is what changes in science, which is why it is a better system to use for predicting future events than other dogma based systems.
Ergo: Recently discovered factor y can be changed as a variable, and this accounts for x sometimes not happening the same way. We must account for this as a variable too.