[CmonDev]

I would rather read a short article with pictures then read a 300+ page book. Both of them are subjective views anyway, it's not an exact science.

[datphp]

It's actually as objective as you get, if there is such a thing as "rational".

Rationality is the main principle of "exact" science too, and is a good tool to work within what we know.

Unfortunately, it's also a limitation, and maybe what's preventing us from transcending our bonds[1].

[1] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/

[cLeEOGPw]

I view it as a sanity check that's preventing us from transcending from reality into imagination, which might or might not have anything to do with how world works.

[nazka]

There is the Philosophy in the Mathematics. It is a real branch like geometry or anything else. Socrate and others are simple to read.

[Tloewald]

Something can be subjective and stupid.

[CmonDev]

Yes, but the contents of the article can be discussed here today. Because it's short.