|
|
|
|
|
|
by market_hacker
4514 days ago
|
|
|
I think there may be a problem with this kind of analysis - it seems to me that the "riskier" plays (2 point conversion, going for it, etc.) - are more likely attempted when coaches think they will work - not randomly. To really do a fair analysis of expectancy you would need trials where the play selection is chosen randomly. Anyone else agree with me? |
|
|