[nivla]

>Nobody uses bing

Not sure if you are trying to pull out the old faded joke or being truly serious. Bing has about 18%-27% market share depending on Organic vs Powered By. No I am not nitpicking a specific blog article, infact its the first summarized link on a Google search for "Bing market share". Bing also powers Siri, which is another major contributor.

>Windows is largely enterprise.

Its revenue may be largely enterprise but its still a monopoly in the consumer side. Infact I can blindly bet that majority of users here on HN is using Windows.

[1] http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2307115/Google-Fails-to...

[marshray]

> No I am not nitpicking a specific blog article

It would be 'nitpicking' to point out that you were not 'cherry picking' one from many possible articles to support your point.

[nivla]

You are absolutely right, that's the word I was looking for. My apologies. :)

[Mikeb85]

> Infact I can blindly bet that majority of users here on HN is using Windows.

I'd be willing to bet that HN has a lot more OSX, Linux and BSD users than the typical split...

[nivla]

Based off the majority of OS related post and comments, I would assume so too but there are a good number of lurkers and users who are non-vocal about their use of Windows. I couldn't find any HN Poll on this matter, but I hope someone who dealt with an HN effect would be kind enough to share their Analytics report on the OS traffic.

[Mikeb85]

Maybe it's like a sort of Stockholm syndrome...

Yesterday a buddy of mine (and partner in crime - the proverbial kind) tried to install a new language and dev environment on his machine. 4 hours and much frustration later, he still couldn't do much.

On Linux the same tasks would have taken 20 minutes (and did, as I had installed the same environment several months ago).

I couldn't imagine doing any development on Windows unless it's C++ or C# on VS... Everything is a hassle compared to Linux.

[nivla]

>Maybe it's like a sort of Stockholm syndrome...

I wouldn't call it that. My assumption is based off of the outcome in desktop market share and the fact of the monopoly title still being held by Windows.

>Yesterday a buddy of mine (and partner in crime - the proverbial kind) tried to install a new language and dev environment on his machine. 4 hours and much frustration later, he still couldn't do much.

Out of curiosity what was he/she installing? Unless its a *nix port of something, all it should involve is install and run.

Well its quiet opposite for me, everytime I try to set up a dev environment or anything GUI related (like media center) on Ubuntu, there is atleast one thing that happens not to work. Googling mostly comes up with a fix where I would need to recompile the whole thing, at which point I give up and switch to Windows.

However, for servers, I love Linux distros, it works perfectly out of box, I can't imagine running Windows for anything server related.

[Mikeb85]

Haxe, git, mercurial, FlashDevelop, Java, etc...

On Linux you use the Haxe install script, then sudo apt-get or sudo zypper install everything. Add a Vim script for context aware code completion, haxelib install a few things, all done.

On Windows - Haxe installed easily. Everything else was a nightmare - had to download everything from every vendor's website, then had to download a bunch of dependencies from various other vendor's websites, then he had to figure out versions of .NET (apparently he needed .NET 2.0 AND .NET 4), 32 bit vs. 64 bit. In hindsight if we were to do it again it'd be quicker, but it was a hassle.

Everything worked (eventually), but it wasn't fun. I'll never again take for granted how Linux pulls in dependencies for everything automatically.

[pistle]

chocolatey.org?