[jaan]

Thanks – I agree with your worries about misinterpretation, especially in regard to flawed study design. We're not trying to be the be-all end-all, but hopefully a decent starting point for further research into the subtleties of a specific topic. That's in addition to trying to make the science more accessible by having it appeal to a wider audience.

We're still narrowing down our content guidelines, so would love your input! Feel free to ping me.

[11001]

Maybe your website will help people see the plethora of inconsistent findings, so they can start questioning the state of science and think of "better ways" for themselves ;)