I double-checked the article and did not see the actual performance numbers.
I want to note that the numbers can be deceiving though because they use different mechanisms to record elapsed time.
When I ran the same task though Unix `time` I got numbers that were much closer, although still in Gulp's favour.
I want to note that the numbers can be deceiving though because they use different mechanisms to record elapsed time.
When I ran the same task though Unix `time` I got numbers that were much closer, although still in Gulp's favour.