[baddox]

> No, this is unacceptable. This sort of fraudulent behavior deserves consequences larger than "hey, stop that".

If you're suggesting that they should be prosecuted, then we can argue that, but Uber is not able to prosecute members of its team. What do you expect Uber to do, other than to stop the behavior?

[potatolicious]

Uber is fully within their rights to levy punishments (up to and including firing) for members of its team.

In this forum we talk constantly about onerous government regulations and the long arm of the law. There are many perfectly legal ways companies can punish or sanction its employees, and IMO it's an eminently good idea to do so.

If you don't want to the government getting all up in your face you're going to have to self-regulate to some degree. Punishing employees who behave unethically is a part of this.

[techreporter]

Another commenter below said he knows an Uber employee in Boston where they not only employ the same tactics with other competitors but also have names for it such as ShopLyfting and SideSwiping.

It looks like this is Uber's culture and not just a few employees in one office behaving unethically. The article also mentions that everyone from the General Manager down were involved in this. The GM is basically the head for a given city. That tells you how far up the chain the lack of ethics goes.

[ig1]

Well Uber can dismiss the employees.

But Gett can take Uber to court, and possibly make a criminal complaint.

[jtbigwoo]

I can't believe they haven't fired the employees that did it and the management that allowed it.

[jessedhillon]

Fire people?