I'd love to know that you have reference to show that with a large amount of data set, hashing is faster than linked list. I don't have the reference at hand, but I know that hashing has a higher cost from speed and memory point of view.
I don't see the original code is a huge issue per se which requires 19 levels? of improvement? I'm curious about how you guys move on though. Will appreciate if you can keep post your solution and progress.
I guess at the end of the entire program, people may learn how to send the query to multiple indexing servers in a concurrent (I prefer this than "distributed") system and then gather together of all the results. At the end of it, it shows how advanced algorithms Google search engine is used to index terabyte of data.
Is that the ultimate solution for a web of data? Take a look of the discussion: http://bit.ly/1f7xIve
Looks like one simple change to hashmap may not be the best answer. May I draw the conclusion from your case like that? The best score now went up to almost 3000. I couldn't imagine how many possible ways out there and one of them could be that excellent. Just curious.
I don't see the original code is a huge issue per se which requires 19 levels? of improvement? I'm curious about how you guys move on though. Will appreciate if you can keep post your solution and progress.
I guess at the end of the entire program, people may learn how to send the query to multiple indexing servers in a concurrent (I prefer this than "distributed") system and then gather together of all the results. At the end of it, it shows how advanced algorithms Google search engine is used to index terabyte of data.
Is that the ultimate solution for a web of data? Take a look of the discussion: http://bit.ly/1f7xIve