|
|
|
|
|
|
by anon1385
4538 days ago
|
|
|
>increase the work towards modularization Is that actually going to happen though? RMS is very clear that he doesn't want it to happen, and continues to argue against it. He knows that the decision to keep the architecture monolithic and only expose unstable internal data structures limits functionality, and he is happy to make that sacrifice: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-12/msg00... The GNU Project campaigns for freedom, not functionality. Sometimes freedom requires a practical sacrifice, and sometimes functionality is part of that sacrifice. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-12/msg00... Part of the reason why clang/llvm weakens our commnity, compared with GCC, is that the clang front ends can feed their data to nonfree tools. |
|
|