[ScottWhigham]

But Obama was "new to DC" - I don't get your logic here.

[dragonwriter]

> But Obama was "new to DC"

When he was elected to the Senate, he was new to DC. When he was elected to the Presidency as a sitting US Senator, not so much.

[ScottWhigham]

It's a tough thing. If you vote for someone with no ties to Washington, you are "voting for someone with no experience." If you vote for someone entrenched in DC, you are "voting for a career politician." It's a lose/lose proposition haha

[dragonwriter]

Its a lose/lose proposition if you adopt both of these two criteria as absolute criteria:

1) You should not vote for someone with no experience in the the federal government, and

2) You should not vote for someone with experience in the federal government.

Of course, these are individually ridiculous criteria in electing a President, and even more ridiculous in combination.

Selecting a President requires more than verifying the presence or absence of a "past experience in federal government" line on a resume.

[notdonspaulding]

Obama came from Chicago politics. He was "new to DC" like John Carmack is "new to Occulus Rift". He might be working with a different crew now, but he's bringing a lot of "experience" to bear.