|
|
|
|
|
|
by Dylan16807
4536 days ago
|
|
|
You didn't do that math right. Out of every 256 values at a particular offset, only a quarter of them are under 64 and can be encoded with rotate+1. Doing a quick brute force test, it appears that there are 3073 unique values. I suppose that makes sense. Each new rotate introduces 192 new values that have at least one of the new bits set, and 192 * 16 = 3072. Then you have the number 0. |
|
|