|
|
|
|
|
|
by dredmorbius
4538 days ago
|
|
|
The interesting cases are pieces which cite a large number of verifiable truths, but then skew specific bits. I think I referenced my Karen Hudes rebuttal on this post already, if not, it's in HN's search from a few weeks back. Ruppert's another case. His history's solid. His conclusions a bit shakier (at least for the timeline). |
|
|