|
|
|
|
|
by taejo
4546 days ago
|
|
> its wins might have had more to do with speed of processing and "buzzing in" than it did with being really smart. It may only be better than humans at buzzing in, but being as good as humans at natural language search, but faster and more consistently (doesn't make mistakes when tired; works just as well in Kampala as New York; can be audited when it makes mistakes) is already better than humans. |
|