|
|
|
|
|
by ambiate
4542 days ago
|
|
Does anyone correlate the 'luck surface area' with that recent discussion on being a sociopath in the workplace. Something along the lines of convincing your coworkers that you're doing more work than you're actually doing. No one can really pinpoint what you do. You just communicate so much that it seems that you're 'in everything'. Just subtract the doing and exponentiate the telling to result in more luck. |
|
If you read in the article he even concedes that very effective people do many of these things, which is why it is an effective cover for incompetence.
Now, I know what you’re thinking — that might actually be productive. And, well, it might be, nominally so. But do you notice that you’ve got a very tangible plan of action here and there’s been no mention of what the project actually involves? A great way to appear useful without being useful is engage heavily in an activity completely orthogonal to the actual goal.
So if the goal aligns with the plan of action and there is "overcommunication" there could well be value added.
[1] http://www.daedtech.com/the-7-habits-of-highly-overrated-peo...