Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bushido 4544 days ago
From the letter:

*> Why is this? As the majority of hobbyists must be aware, most of you steal your software. Hardware must be paid for, but software is something to share."

I'll have to dig around but I recall reading a few articles about 60%+ windows OS being pirated, this number is much lower in US and other developed markets, but is as high as 93% in some[0].

[0] http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_sof_pir_rat-crime-soft...

edit: site seems to be unavailable. Link @ archive.org:

https://web.archive.org/web/20100316174220/http://www.cryptn...

3 comments

But it is not about windows OS. In 1976 there were no windows OS. It's about this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altair_BASIC
I know.

Was just stating the problem that plagued them in 1976 is still persistent today.

Though on re-reading my previous comment I can see that I was not clear on that.

Software piracy, no matter where I or anyone stands on it, is part of the economy. It's a forced sale price of zero just as FOSS. The interesting bit is there may be support costs, server costs and other indirect costs associated with pirated software. This hampers a shop's ability to release more versions and keep quality up. (Although it seems like there's always another version of VMware Fusion every time I turn around despite there being barely any investment into its development.)

And also there are interesting situations like DoD and BestBuy. Obviously the profit motive prevails after they've paid their fines and cut POs for maintenance agreements on X thousand seats.

Hypothetically, it would make financial sense for some high value products with a small market to intentionally "leak" to warez groups. It's easier to discover and monetize such obligated customers than fight year long sales cycles and/or pilot deployments.

“Hardware must be paid for”, but if you're lucky, the government pays for it and you can ‘borrow’ it when no one's looking.