I'm currently reading The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, the first part of the book talks about the methods Hitler and others used to get to power. Trust me, you'd take your statement back if you knew.
SA was in essence a gang of lowlifes that used murder, intimidation and terror to get rid of opponents.
Hitler had amazing abilities to lie to everyone to get to the result he wanted.
That said, one can not fail drawing up parallels with some of the aspects how The Third Reich got to power and how the people running it operated with what's going on in the world today.
Also to be clear I mean the NY times. Nothing wrong with a multi faceted opinion but it's not cool that they don't even point out the evolution of their beliefs. I mean isn't that the point of having an awarded newspaper?
SA was in essence a gang of lowlifes that used murder, intimidation and terror to get rid of opponents.
Hitler had amazing abilities to lie to everyone to get to the result he wanted.
That said, one can not fail drawing up parallels with some of the aspects how The Third Reich got to power and how the people running it operated with what's going on in the world today.
http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Fall-Third-Reich-ebook/dp/B005Z57...