|
|
|
|
|
|
by itsadok
4546 days ago
|
|
|
> The converse problem is having to write iterator versions of map, filter, and other eagerly-evaluated builtins Well, in Python 2 you just use imap instead of map. That way you have both options, and you can be explicit rather than implicit. > That's not a list of numbers... that's a list of bytes! The point being made here is not that some things are not possible in Python 3, but rather than things that are natural in Python 2 are ugly in 3. I believe you're proving the point here. The idea that b'a'[0] == 97 in such a fundamental way that I might get one when I expected the other may be fine in C, but I hold Python to a higher standard. |
|
|