I'm putting up resistance because there is still very little I have heard that makes sense. I do consider myself a skeptic, and I think skepticism is a requirement for critical thinking rather than an obstacle to it.
A person willing to learn says, "That's interesting and it doesn't make sense to me for X, Y, and Z reasons. I'm obviously not getting something and am probably confused about something important." That is not what you're saying.
Being a skeptic is orthogonal to having that attitude.
Anyhow, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, ...
I'll just end it here and you can reply however you'd like or not at all. :)
That's very much what baddox is saying, but with less self-deprecation. He/she is continuing to ask questions and indicating that the concept does not make sense to him/her. Asking critical questions about the utility of the concept, etc. are all very well in line with skeptical approaches towards anything.
> My questions are actually genuine and not rhetorical. I would appreciate responses, or perhaps corrections of my impression of the concept of privilege.
Whether or not I was lying then, I am unable to express any more clearly or convincingly that I am willing to learn.
And I believe I have explained what doesn't make sense to me.
Being a skeptic is orthogonal to having that attitude.
Anyhow, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, ...
I'll just end it here and you can reply however you'd like or not at all. :)