[shortstuffsushi]

> I would dispute it based on principle.

What principle exactly? You had an accident that (minimally) affected me, so I'm going to charge you for it? I could understand if it was something major, but for the hypothetical dollar, really?

[brianpgordon]

The principle that someone else's mistakes shouldn't cost you money.

[shortstuffsushi]

I reiterate, if it was a major amount of money, I can see that. Pursuing actions against someone who made a mistake just seems unnecessary. They've already publicly admitted they screwed something up. Someone on their end probably got into major trouble, if not fired, for said mistake.

The instinct to say, "you screwed up and now you're going to pay" baffles me every time. Why does everyone feel entitled to seek compensation for inconvenience? When did that become ok?

I see this on here constantly, and whenever it's pointed out, it's immediately down voted. And yeah, I'm expecting this to get down voted, again.

[Diamons]

Because people have this thing called a backbone. If you're fine with someone going into your account and pulling money at will, all the power to you, but most people will not tolerate that shit. You are a customer and they are a business, no feelings, no emotional bullshit, simple straight up facts.

[shortstuffsushi]

I disagree pretty fundamentally with your first line. "Having a backbone" is in no way equivalent to being reasonable when someone (or an organization) makes a mistake.

> If you're fine with someone going into your account and pulling money at will, all the power to you

If you've got a Google AdMob, you've already done this, right? You've given them the ability to push/pull from your account, and signed whatever agreement about "we're not responsible for xyz."

I don't have an account, but presumably there was some line in there about not being liable for mischarges, or something along those lines.