[wonderzombie]

Of course. That said, Clojure doesn't have those, given that it has a dynamic type system and destructuring instead of pattern matching (not as clean, IMHO), so a comparison to Haskell in this respect is less useful.

[catnaroek]

My point was that it is perfectly possible to be familiar with Haskell and find Clojure (and Lisps in general) puzzling.

On the other hand, I would be genuinely surprised if someone familiar with Haskell were unable to pick up ML, or vice versa.

[dkersten]

If you want pattern matching, check out core.match

[catnaroek]

Where is the exhaustiveness checking?