[gibsonsecurity]

Hahahaha, I don't think making it harder to reverse would be any better, it would probably motivate people even more (deobfuscation is too much fun and fairly easy!).

They should really just focus on improving what they have and pushing clients towards a safer protocol slowly.

Snaps being stolen will always happen, but I do like the approach Instagram took to preventing spammers (getInstagramString(), it stopped everyone until they adapted!).

[kaivi]

Yep, but at least that would be fun, don't you agree?

I also wonder why didn't anybody set up a Snapchat bot yet: it could successfully impersonate multiple humans by forwarding snaps between pairs of unsuspecting users, gathering a lot of data that way.

[rmccue]

Actually, I know of one set up by a friend: snaproulettebot. You send a snap, and it sends you a random one back later from another user. Being called "snaproulettebot" makes it pretty obvious what it is, but you could do it in a more opaque way.

[gibsonsecurity]

Definitely, lol.

That's a pretty sneaky idea, I'm sure its possible with all the clients now available!

[way66]

Could you explain what is the getInstagramString()? Thanks!